Perma-Bound Edition ©2024 | -- |
Publisher's Hardcover ©2023 | -- |
Paperback ©2024 | -- |
This text-heavy digital ethics guide for young people is adapted from the authors' adult title You Are Here (2021). Phillips and Milner, literacy media educators, define information pollution on social media using an ecological approach ing mindful of connection, consequences, and shared responsibility on social media. Both authors take turns explaining how they can help young readers "identify pollution risks, minimize the bad stuff you're putting into the online environment, and maximize the good stuff." They use social-media posts shared by a group of middle-school students throughout as illustrations. Tools to help young social-media posters keep their online spaces healthier for themselves and others are provided. Suggestions include being aware of your motivation for posting something and recognizing how others' beliefs and assumptions influence your own assumptions. Although situations feature middle-school-age youth, the discussion is more academic and lacks illustrations to break up the text. Useful for teachers, less so for casual readers.
Kirkus Reviews (Mon Nov 06 00:00:00 CST 2023)Careless posting can produce unpredictably harmful repercussions-and come back to hurt us-say the authors of this adaptation of their 2021 volume for adults on digital ethics, You Are Here.Two university professors who specialize in communication in online environments offer teens advice on navigating the digital world. Short-term thinking is presented as a central problem. Comparisons of online "information pollution" with elements from nature such as the redwoods and hurricanes and concepts like the biomass pyramid help make the authors' points accessible. Stressing and sharing can become a vicious circle: Anxious doomscrolling ratchets up worries, and some then share bad news impulsively without checking its accuracy or considering the consequences. The authors advocate shifting one's perspective, benefiting from what's known as the overview effect; their explanation of real-life and online context is widely applicable. Media users should also know how their content is monetized, how information is weaponized against marginalized groups, and why the motto "don't feed the trolls" allows bias and hatred to flourish. The writing strives for a chatty, not-too-serious tone and avoids scolding, but experts and their research are often cited, validating the information. Text boxes labeled "reflection" invite readers to make personal, experiential connections to the authors' points, as do anecdotes, direct questions, a (somewhat confusing) overarching narrative about fictional teens and their online interactions, and interludes with authorial comments and exchanges.Offers sensible steps for foreseeing and minimizing damage to ourselves and others on social media. (source notes, bibliography, index) (Nonfiction. 14-18)
ALA Booklist (Mon Nov 06 00:00:00 CST 2023)
Kirkus Reviews (Mon Nov 06 00:00:00 CST 2023)
Ecological Thinking and You
Whitney: There we were, exploring a place we'll call Redwood Adventure Park, a nature attraction in Northern California. It was 2003, and my parents and teenage brother and sister were visiting during my first year of college. We'd decided to drive along the coast and visit every Highway 101 pit stop we could find. Road sign after road sign pointed us to this particular adventure, so five twenty-dollar tickets later, we were in weird redwood heaven. Wooden placards gave background stories on all the trees, and there were carved stumps--of woodland creatures, loggers, and Bigfoot--everywhere. A few months earlier, I'd given myself a buzz cut and dyed my naturally blondish hair black for "I'll show you, world" reasons. It had grown out into an unruly mullet and was flopping around mop-like as I scampered among the living and carved-up trees, giggling at what could only be described as forest clickbait.
After wandering the park's crisscrossing trails, we decided to head over to the forest ridge lookout for a bird's-eye view of the canopy. At the top of a seemingly endless flight of stairs, a worker wearing head-to-toe pink camouflage ushered us onto the viewing platform, gestured around dramatically, and told us in a hushed voice that on one side we'd see the ocean and on the other, "the Awesomeness," which I think just meant more trees.
But before we could climb to the top, my sister needed to finish drinking her hot chocolate. "'Kay, ready," she said when she was finished. She handed her empty cup to my mom, who held it for a moment. Then, looking right at my sister, my mom threw the cup smack on the ground. We all paused. Gasped! Why would she do such a thing? And then my mom started laughing. She bent down to pick up the cup. "The look on your faces!" she said, still laughing. We all started laughing too, and then, of course, as soon as we saw a trash can, she threw the cup away.
This was funny because, for one thing, it was so unexpected. I'd never seen my mom litter in my whole life. It was also funny because it was exactly what you're not supposed to do at a park. If you did, you'd have to walk around in your own mess. Other people would have to walk around in it too, and some of them might get the idea that hey, fun, it's fine to throw trash here, making it more likely that more people would throw their trash wherever. From there, it could end up in a river or be swallowed by a goose. The moral of the story, said in my best judgmental Bigfoot voice, is that throwing your trash on the ground when you're at a park doesn't just impact you. It impacts others as well, Mom.
RYAN: Trash, or at least stuff you don't want to have to walk through, is a theme in this book. But instead of actual dirty cups on the ground, we're focused on information pollution.
Here's an example from one of my communication classes. I live in Charleston, South Carolina, and we get a lot of hurricanes. That means a lot of rain. After Hurricane Matthew flooded parts of the city in 2016, one of my students brought in a picture of a shark swimming around in someone's front yard. He was showing it to other students before class, telling us all to watch out for sharks if we were walking through flooded streets. As the old-man media professor and multiple-hurricane survivor in the room, I had the sad duty of telling my student that his shark picture was an obvious fake; I'd seen it passed around the internet for years. The real reason not to splash around in urban floodwater, I explained, is that it comes up from the sewer. And sewer water is treacherous enough without sharks sloshing through it. My student glared at me and then at his phone and then sat down. "But my friend sent this to me," he insisted. And maybe his friend was just trying to be helpful. That still does not a yard shark make.
WHITNEY: Here's another example a student shared in one of my media literacy classes. This student had a close girlfriend group, and they were constantly posting photos to Instagram of parties and other college whatnot. One friend only posted photos where she looked good, even if the other friends in the pictures were sneezing or seemed constipated, which the rest of the group noticed and giggled about among themselves but never mentioned to their friend.
One day, the friend posted a group photo to Instagram that she'd photoshopped to make herself look thinner. The whole image--and her friends' bodies--had been distorted as a result, making her edit and her motives, let's say, obvious. My student had been in that picture and admitted to downloading it and sending it to her other girlfriends over group chat. They thought it was hilarious. So hilarious, in fact, that someone in the chat also downloaded the image and posted it to another chat, which made that group laugh too, until eventually the image circulated back to the friend who'd posted it. She was horrified to find out that everyone had been laughing at her behind her back, and her friends were horrified to realize how upset she was. Even though they didn't mean any harm, the entire friend group had to deal with the fallout.
RYAN: Both stories are examples of information pollution, which can take the form of polluted information and polluting information. In the yard-shark story, the information is polluted. This is the more obvious type of information pollution, and you may have heard it described as misinformation (false or misleading information spread by accident) or disinformation (false or misleading information spread on purpose). When talking about mis- and disinformation, a person's motives for sharing matter; you need to know why someone shared something to accurately describe it. Polluted information, on the other hand, doesn't need you to know whether something was spread on purpose or by accident. It all ends up in the same goose.
Excerpted from Share Better and Stress Less by Whitney Phillips, Ryan Milner
All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.
“Offers sensible steps for foreseeing and minimizing damage to ourselves and others on social media.” —Kirkus Reviews
We know that pollution damages our physical environments—but what about the digital landscape? Touching on everything from goat memes gone wrong to conflict in group chats to the sometimes unexpected side effects of online activism, this lively guide to media literacy draws on ecological, social justice, and storytelling frameworks to help readers understand how information pollution spreads and why. It also helps them make sense of the often stressful and strange online world. Featuring a hyperconnected cast of teens and their social-media shenanigans, this reader-friendly paperback with a refreshed cover tackles the thorny topic of internet ethics while empowering—and inspiring—young readers to weave a safe, secure, and inclusive digital world. Readers are invited to delve further into the subject with the help of comprehensive source notes and a bibliography in the back matter.